Showing posts with label unemployment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unemployment. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
(Opinion) student debt: The kids are not alright
There is much
you can say about the world we inhabit, its cold, cruel, sadistic or on the
positive side, full of possibilities, but for young people across the globe, It’s
debt inducing. Student debt has always been an issue but now it is becoming a
real problem to the point where analysts are touting it as the next crisis. In the
US. According to an article in the mercury news, student debt will affect
college graduates looking to buy a home will be denied due to student debt affecting
the average graduate ‘debt -to- income ratio’[1].
This is no doubt attributable to student debt reaching the 1 trillion mark and
graduates having to “carry a average burden of $25,250”[2].
The problem
of student debt is even affecting students from relatively wealthy backgrounds
with a jump from $26,639 to $32,869 within the space of three years[3].
As a result of affluence, better off households do not for the most part receive
the financial assistance of scholarships and grants afforded to lower income households
to offset the cost of student debt[4].
In knowledge of this, students from middle class to upper class backgrounds are
now enrolling in less prestigious institutions in an attempt to offset the cost
of attending a highly rated university[5].
Student
debt has strong links as to why there are high rates of youth unemployment in
many countries across the globe with “over 75 million (young people) worldwide
looking for work”[6]. In
Canada, students have struggled to find ‘summer jobs’ which has culminated in a
employment reaching its lowest rate since 1977[7].
Students usually
find it difficult to find work after graduating from high education institutions
due to a lack of experience and a lack of positions to be filled.
Such a trend
has been experienced by law students as “law schools are becoming very
expensive and are not always able to provide students with the job
opportunities they were promised”[8].
This is because the application to enter such schools are just as competitive
as the job market they will enter after they graduate as student are required
to “distinguish themselves from other applicants. A good GPA, high scores on
the LSAT and the ability to
write are the most important qualities”[9].
In sum, Student debt will always been as it always has but
with the current indicators suggesting that student will affect the progress of
graduates through the monetary choices
must be addressed by through legislative efforts to help lighten the burden
weighing heavily on student across the globe.
[1] T. Grant, 2012, Student Debt pushes
homes out of reach, study finds,
http://www.mercurynews.com/real-estate/ci_21366216/student-debt-pushes-homes-out-reach-study-finds
[2] Ibid
[3] D. Kadlec, 2012, Student Debt: why
even the affluent struggle,
http://moneyland.time.com/2012/08/10/student-debt-why-even-the-affluent-struggle/
[4] Ibid
[5] Ibid
[6] ILO, 2012, youth unemployment,
http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/youth-employment/lang--en/index.htm#a2
[7] L. Payton, 2012, student jobless
rate shows need for government help, says MP, http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/07/11/pol-students-youth-jobless-rate-high.html
[8] M.
Ceppaglia, 2012, Job market affect Law Students,
http://www.udreview.com/job-market-affects-law-students-1.2891308#.UEXxDVI0WSo
[9] Ibid
Labels:
2012,
opinion,
student debt,
Student protest,
unemployment,
youth
Thursday, June 7, 2012
(Opinion) Unemployment and the 'Work For Experience scam'
While the coalition government pats itself on the back as 45,000 people found work despite of the well into 2 million people in the Britain who haven't, and the UK economy set to further contract, the future for many Britons looks bleak to say the least. While it was not bed of roses for working people as they saw their debt obligations rise and their wages stagnate or actively decrease, a dignified existence could be maintained, that is until the bottom fell out in 2007.
Now Britons, especially those of the working class variety, find ourselves in the quagmire of excessive competition for limited places and having to work for free which can explain why the stewards used for the Queen's Diamond Jubilee were largely apprentices or unemployed job-seekers.
While some may rush into the debate and see the relationship between apprentices and job-seekers drafted in by companies for free as purely exploitative, they largely haven't experienced job-seeking at the lower end of the labour market where the unemployed have to deal with one of the oldest catch-22s in the labour market; experience.
With their being a shortage of jobs and surplus in available labour, the main factor used to pick a candidate from all the others is experience, as it is rather costly for employers to train new staff and mitigate the likely cost of rookie mistakes.
To deal with this disadvantage, inexperienced or unskilled workers have to take work where they will probably will work for free or work well below the minimum wage. While those who see this relationship as exploitative are right to say so, without such a relationship there will be no way for inexperienced or unskilled workers to deal with the major disadvantage in the labour market, and employers know it.
Now with their being a major labour surplus, many unemployed jobseekers, especially those who lack experience, have to work for free while companies may say they are working for experience, anyone with sketchy knowledge of exploitation will see those people are working for free and companies who take advantage of the labour surplus profit.
In conclusion, while the relationship between companies and inexperienced workers has always been exploitative, it has increasingly, especially due to large unemployment levels, become necessary as workers seek to mitigate one of the biggest barriers to employment.The furore over the stewards who took part in guarding the event were working for free has only revealed a relationship that has existed for decades and, at one point, was about to become a government backed scheme.
Now Britons, especially those of the working class variety, find ourselves in the quagmire of excessive competition for limited places and having to work for free which can explain why the stewards used for the Queen's Diamond Jubilee were largely apprentices or unemployed job-seekers.
While some may rush into the debate and see the relationship between apprentices and job-seekers drafted in by companies for free as purely exploitative, they largely haven't experienced job-seeking at the lower end of the labour market where the unemployed have to deal with one of the oldest catch-22s in the labour market; experience.
With their being a shortage of jobs and surplus in available labour, the main factor used to pick a candidate from all the others is experience, as it is rather costly for employers to train new staff and mitigate the likely cost of rookie mistakes.
To deal with this disadvantage, inexperienced or unskilled workers have to take work where they will probably will work for free or work well below the minimum wage. While those who see this relationship as exploitative are right to say so, without such a relationship there will be no way for inexperienced or unskilled workers to deal with the major disadvantage in the labour market, and employers know it.
Now with their being a major labour surplus, many unemployed jobseekers, especially those who lack experience, have to work for free while companies may say they are working for experience, anyone with sketchy knowledge of exploitation will see those people are working for free and companies who take advantage of the labour surplus profit.
In conclusion, while the relationship between companies and inexperienced workers has always been exploitative, it has increasingly, especially due to large unemployment levels, become necessary as workers seek to mitigate one of the biggest barriers to employment.The furore over the stewards who took part in guarding the event were working for free has only revealed a relationship that has existed for decades and, at one point, was about to become a government backed scheme.
Labels:
corporations,
crisis,
jobseekers,
opinion,
unemployment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)