Showing posts with label U.S.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S.. Show all posts

Thursday, December 20, 2012

(Backgrounder) Money Laundering: What Is Money Laundering?






Over the last few weeks, we have heard a lot banks about Banks Laundering money belonging to organized crime operations, rogue states and even terrorist networks. In this backgrounder, The Carnage Report will answer the question; what exactly is money laundering?

What is Money Laundering?

Money laundering is the process by which illegally attained funds are put through a series of transactions so that when it comes out at the end it becomes money that is attained legally. Typically the money is deposited into an off shore account, foreign bank, or business that keeps few records. This allows for the money to then be transferred back as a tax exempt legal currency.

The act of money laundering was established as a criminal act back in 1919 in the USA. However due to the lack of documentation banks were required to carry, many  instances of laundering went unnoticed. In 1970, the United States congress passed the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). Because of the Bank Secrecy Act, forms were introduced to create a paper trail for banks and the IRS to follow like bread crumbs. This allowed the IRS to disrupt and destroy many money laundering operations and organizations most notable related to the mafia, drug trafficking, and other less than reputable ventures.

Money Laundering Examples Relating to Current Affairs

There have been many money laundering operations that have come to light within this past few years. The RBS ( Royal Bank of Scotland) has been in trouble as recently as last July with the US Federal Reserve for suspected breaking of the American trade sanctions with rogue nations, including Iran. This probe derailed the sell-off of RBS's US subsidiary, Citizens to Santander a Spanish based bank. The well-known ING Bank back in June was slapped with a $619 million settlement for an investigation into compliance with the United States sanctions levied against Iran, Cuba, and numerous other countries.

At the time, it was the biggest fine ever paid by a banking institution to settle accusations, wrapped in facts, for money laundering. During the investigation by the Treasury Department, there were more than twenty thousand transactions found with deleted or manipulated information. This allowed individuals in countries under sanctions to move money into and out of the United States. Lloyds TSB reached a settlement with the United States and New York State back in January for $350 million. They admitted to moving more than $300mil for Iranian clients by stripping personal information to hide the identity of their clients.

Not to be out done, Credit Suisse has been laid with a $539 million in monetary penalties for its connection to violations of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and of course New York State law. The Swiss banking giant saw an increase in its dealings with Iranian financial firms by almost 400% from 2002 at about 49,000 transactions to 2005 reaching over 200,000 transactions. This was because in 2003 the Lloyds TSB stopped clearing activity for its Iranian clients. Those clients switched to the less regulated bank, Credit Suisse.

Credit Suisse went from just stripping information to forming a team called the “specially designated payment team” that manually reviewed over 95% of all transactions from Iranian clients.  These are just some of the recent banks to settle or be fined for failing money laundering practices. However, there is one that must be talked about in detail as it is extremely recent in news.
           
The current biggest known money laundering case would be the HSBC snafu in which the settlement for the fine and forfeit of illegal moneys was estimated at around $1.92 billion. Back in July 2012, there was a 300 page report compiled for a United States Senate committee finding failure upon failure that HSBC was being used as an aqueduct for drug cartels and rogue nations to funnel money into the United States financial system. This led United States authorities to the nearly $2 billion fine against HSBC for failing to stop laundering under the banking systems. 

The most note-worthy to me would be the dealings with Saudi Arabia's Al Rajhi Bank. The Al Rajhi Bank was a member of Osama bin Ladin's “Golden Chain” of Al Qaeda financiers. The decades of dealings made it hard for HSBC to cut off their ties. Their own internal compliance offices asked for dealings to be terminated as early as 2005. The United States government even had hard evidence of the terrorist relationships that Al Rajhi Bank had, but HSBC still continued to do business with them until 2010.

In another branch, HSBC Mexico failed to close accounts of high-profile clients that were involved in drug trafficking. Both Mexican and United States authorities expressed deep concern over the ability of drug trafficker to circumvent the Anti-Money laundering regulations of US banks by first transporting US dollars to Mexico and then using HBMX 
(branch of HSBC in Mexico) to ship the money into the United States. To look further for an example, the HBMX shopped over $7 billion to the United States main body HSBC. 

Of course, HSBC classed Mexico as a low-risk country and continued to fail to adequately monitor its dealings and transfers of money into and out of the country. This is just part of the many money laundering problems that the HSBC had in the “closet”. Though this is a major blow to the money laundering practices around the world, it is still sad to see HSBC not be brought up on criminal indictment charges that would have further stressed the severe penalties for pursuing money laundering as an acceptable form of business. Still the criminal indictment was only dropped after attaining the high fines by the prosecutors.

Final Thoughts

Obviously everything here boils down to one simple thing. Greed. With so many banks around the world failing to enforce anti-money laundering practices, I find my trust and the trust of the people is being eroded to the point where it is becoming hard to maintain a positive outlook towards banks. Now, do not get me wrong. Banks are a needed commodity for business and clients from all walks of life, but the more failures and corruption are displayed for the world to see; the more it hurts the economic stability of the all nations. This is because banks are built on a type of trust. A trust that should be without doubt, but that is becoming an extremely rare commodity. So, I urge everyone to be wary and keep watch for money laundering is just the tip of the ice-burg in a far greater problem of rampant corruption in our financial institutions. 

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

(Video) Westboro Baptist Church: Unnatural Allies


(Video) Instagram Privacy: Privacy For Cash


(Opinion) Sandy Hook Massacre: Gun Control Legislation Cannot Be Denied Any Longer




Sandy Hook Massacre


This article will not recount the horror and carnage that took place on Friday December 14th as the events that transpired on that day are seared into the collective American consciousness and beyond. What this article will address in length is the reaction to such a tragedy as all that can be done now is to remember and bury the 20 children and 7 adults who perished and do everything possible to make such an act doesn’t happen again.  

President Obama has accomplished much in his four years in office, he has made sure women are paid the same amount as men for the same work, he has rid this world of the menace of Osama Bin Laden and a played a large role in saving the American automotive industry but has been disappointingly silent on the need for gun control.

Gun control is a difficult issue to negotiate for democrats and republicans as the democrats appear not have to have the stomach for a showdown with the powerful and influential gun lobby and the republicans operate as wholly owned subsidiary of it. However after the Sandy Hook Massacre, such excuses will not quell the ground swell across the nation calling for something to be done on guns.

Political expediency is no excuse to do nothing in the face of great tragedy, while this not the first mass shooting the president has done little to combat, with the death of  27 people, most of which were children, president Obama surely does not want to be known as the president who did nothing in response to the cold blooded murder of 27 American citizens.

The president has had the opportunity to address prevalence of guns in American society but has shirked the opportunity to act or even comment at any length on the need for gun control. Four major mass shootings have taken place under Obama’s Presidency, which is, obviously four too many. He must do everything to prevent there being a fifth tragedy, making inaction an national travesty and personal shame on the president as he, through doing nothing reneges on his first duty as president of the united states, keep his fellow citizens safe from all threats foreign and domestic.  

Obama must take on the powerful gun lobby and pro-gun republicans in coming up with smart and needed gun control legislation starting with a ban on assault rifles and automatic weapons as such weapons have only one function: to kill and maim whatever and whoever they are aimed at.

In conclusion, there are no excuses for the Obama Whitehouse and congress not acting on putting together reasonable gun control legislation in the face of unspeakable horror and pain simply because time, the American people will except nothing less than bold action, the price for the failure to act will serve as a vindication of why political institutions in America are hated by it citizens. It will also be a personal shame on a president who promised so much back in 2008 who would been seen by fellow citizens to have reneged on his highest duty as president above all else; to keep fellow Americans safe.              

(Video) Mike Huckabee: God and Guns


(Opinion) Fracking: Fracking-Yes or No?


Gasland Halliburton  300x168 ‘Gasland’ film blows the fracking top off US natural gas industry


What is Fracking?

Fracking or hydraulic fracturing is a process to extract natural gas from Shale rock layers that involves injecting chemicals, often toxic, and gallons of water under high pressure. Hydraulic fracturing is different than just drilling as it is injecting fluid in the veins of a rock and expanding them. With such a great amount of pressure and chemicals, the rock shatters releasing the gas flow.

By doing this it creates new channels in which the natural gases can be extracted from the rock. Unlike oil, cases that use this method are doing so because putting any type of drill into the rock instantly creates enough friction to produce sparks which could easily light the natural gases on fire. Send the whole project exploding. This is why the men are required to keep a constant vigil on the equipment and materials they use.

Use of Fracking

Fracking was started in 1947, now it is used extensively for extracting natural gas. Britain's government welcomes the resumption of fracking. Lancashire signals green to the company Cuadrilla resources. Government of Northern Ireland is considering fracking by an Australian company, Tamboran which has a license to explore the method of gas extraction in County Fermangh. In the US, California has yet to begin fracking in earnest. In Montery County, the Denver based Oil Company Venoco has been given a green signal. Fracking, though is yet to be used in many parts of the world, yet we come across many such massive uses of fracking globally.

Induced hydraulic fracturing is commonly used to either increase the flow or restore the flow of fluids in a rock like petroleum, water, and natural gas. Typically these are used on porous sandstone, lime stones or dolomite rocks and sometimes include shale or coal beds. Also, this tends to be used for rocks that are 1,000 – 6,000 miles below the surface as the depth may cause there to not be enough pressure to allow natural gas and oil to flow from the rocks into the well bore at the rates of the current economy. This method can cause super fracking which provides a wealthy yield of gases for about a year or two and then drops off at an extreme rate.

The way that this fluid is applied is it is poured down a hole and into the rocks below, spreading it to the rock bed below to make it exceed the pressure rate of the rock. Once the crack forms the fluid seeps further in to the rock and does not stop. The operator uses prop-pant to slow the rate of fracturing so that when the fluid stops the prop-pant stops the cracks from refilling and stopping the rate of fluid. Once the fluid begins to stop it needs to be controlled before it begins to change the geometry of the cracks of other rock beds and materials beside it, otherwise it could damage that areas fracture rate which would decrease product efficiency.


The equipment used with oils and natural gas is a more slurry blender with a high pressure fracturing pump with a monitor to watch it all.

Prop-pants consists of many things as prop-pant is just a generalized name including several different materials. These could be silica sand, resin-coated sand, or man-made ceramics. The type of prop-pant depends on the gradient that they are working with and the strength that is needed. While the most common is the silica sand, the man-made ceramics are more efficient in doing the job. Due to higher porosity of the fracture, more gases flow through and are collected.

Fracking Controversy

So, now that we know about what fracking, and what it is used for, let's talk about controversy. The controversy has been running since fracking was first implemented in 1947. There is always a chance of the chemicals escaping into under ground water sources. There are many diseases that can result from this because when it happens the contaminated water is left in a severely unhealthy state.

That being said, the news of the world has had a massive amount of coverage on this controversy lately. In the UK last year, fracking was put on hold due to the gas explorer Cuadrilla Resources being linked to a series of strong earthquakes. Now, the UK has given the go ahead for fracking to resume but only under super strict regulations. In the USA, there have been numerous displays of fracking gone bad. In Michigan, many gas explorer companies are renewing interest in the deposits there. California is still on hold to start fracking projects of their own.

Multiple states including Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and Texas have had massive fracking projects run to.Sadly, in every place that has been listed, there have been multiple cases of chronic health problems due to the mishandling of waste, contamination of drinking water, and even the air. The off set of viable energy, money, and so forth is not a viable reason to me and certainly not to the people who actually have received health problems from this energy “boon”.

Look at the study done by professor Robert W. Howarth of Cornell University, in it he quotes that 3.6% to 7.9% of the methane escaping from shale-gas productions happens of the lifetime of the well. Breathing methane in small amounts is not very detrimental to the health of a person. However, at these rates the concentration is enough to cause many health problems like unstable emotions, nausea, vomiting, respiratory collapse, and in extreme cases death. I mention this because methane is a main ingredient in natural gas production. Many places that use fracking inversely effect the surrounding cities, towns, and landscapes because of this and the amount of chemicals and water being forced into places it was never meant to go.


In 2010, Josh Fox released the movie “Gas-Land” depicting the effects of fracking on different communities in the USA.  Because the U.S. Created this method, almost all the environmental impact studies have been based here. The is also a final concern about water consumption is arid places where it can affect water supplies. Here an average well's requirement is 3 to 8 million US gallons (11,000 to 30,000 m3) of water, typically within one week.


Conclusion

It is still an issue of debate whether using fracking is safe and should be allowed or not, yet the ever growing demand and pressing price of oil makes it nearly impossible to deny its use. There have been many conventions coming to argue that it is unsafe, and though it is, almost all of them are area based. Some areas experience more health issues than others, some have to repair the environment that they're in, but other areas are not even effected or phased by the fluid. The fact that the damage is so dependent on the area in which the fracking takes place makes it difficult to determine whether the whole of the regime is safe or not. However, with how unstable our world is becoming, it is time for us as people to find a better way of doing things for our future. We have the technology. So, why don't we use it wisely.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Friday, December 14, 2012

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

(Video) Immortal technique: Immortal technique speaks at We Are Change Connecticut


Rapper/Activist Immortal Technique speaks to a captive We Are Change Connecticut audience with Cornell West  

(Video) Michigan 'Right to Work' laws: the slow death of the worker continues


The Young Turks reports on the response by workers to the newly enacted 'right to work' laws in Michigan. 

(Book Review) Mind Maps: Quicker Notes, Better Memory, and Improved Learning 2.0 by Michael Taylor









More and more, we find ourselves in an age where we are inundated with information, most of which has no use to us. We are in need of a method or technique to frame our thoughts and control the flow of information we take in. Confronting this reality, this book helps us take in information and frame our thoughts through the method of mind mapping.


Mind mapping is a useful and deceptively simple tool to organize and frame our thoughts. It helps us think about things differently as we note information differently than the traditional way of note taking. It is designed to make its user record and use information the exact way our brains take in and interprets information.

Mind Mapping has positive implications for all of us in the information age as we seek to educate ourselves and learn about new subjects. Specially, as we come across new experiences shaping our thinking and ultimately how we react in the world.

In sum, this book is a must grab is it does what most books you encounter don’t; help you deal effectively with a new reality and, through some trial and error, adapt to it.

Get your copy of  Mind Maps: Quicker Notes, Better Memory, and Improved Learning 2.0 
here.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

(Video) Oliver Stone: Young Turks Interview


The legendary writer/director talks to the Young Turks Cenk Uygur about his new book and TV project The Untold History of the United States




Check out The Untold History of the United States airing on showtime at 8 pm

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

(Video) Karl Rove and Dick Morris: Consequences of Promising Rain in California

(Video) Joe Stiglitz and Paul Krugman: two heavyweights talk economics

(Opinion) Palestinian UN statehood bid: Israeli reaction proves that it has no interest in peace


After decades of largely fruitless negotiations with Israel, Palestine decided take a new approach of advancing their cause through the UN and have successfully enhanced their status to a non-member observer state. The Palestinian have realized that the path to peace cannot be reached by negotiating with Israel, who have, for last 60 years, been the world’s leading practitioners of salami tactics from the growth of kibbutz’s in the early twentieth century, to the effective land grabs via the growth of settlements and the use of deadly force.

Palestine has always been at a disadvantage in negotiations due to the fact that Palestine is not a state and for the most part, doesn’t have anything that Israel wants, except land. Add into the mix the U.S. unwavering support of Israel despite this disparity; Palestinians have been trapped in a constant cycle of conflict (which favours the stronger and well-funded Israel) and peace talks that serve as the quintessential demonstrations of bad faith negotiations. Israel have proved time and again that it has no interest in peace or coming up with a logical solution to the conflict with its wickedly disproportionate responses to defeatist rocket attacks by Hamas and its constant expansion into the west bank via settlements.

If there was any need for proof of Israel’s lack of interest in peace or logical solution, we would only have to observe Israel’s reaction to Palestine’s enhanced status. In an act that can only be described as state retribution for the Palestinian Authority abandoning the negotiation table, Israel “seized more than $120m (£75m) in tax revenues it collects on the behalf of the Palestinian authority”[1]

While Israel’s finance minister regurgitated the official story that the money was taken to pay down a debt incurred by  the Palestinian authority owed to the Israel electric corporation, It was revealed by a ‘Israeli official’ that “the move was in response to the UN vote”[2]. This is nothing new as Israel have “frozen   the monthly revenues as sanction against the PA, resulting in the late payment of salaries of thousands of public servants in the West Bank and Gaza”[3].

However Israel saved its most pernicious announcement for last as it proposed it will “build 3,000 new homes in settlements across the pre – 1967 Green line” but more importantly, Israel plan to “push ahead with development  of an area known as E1” which will pretty much destroy the two state solution as the project  “ would close off  East Jerusalem – the intended future capital of Palestine”[4] .

Israel  plan to kill the two state solution through further encroachment into the West Bank is counterproductive and  even drew the ‘condemnation’ of its two foremost allies, the US and Britain[5]
The chances of their expansion plans bearing are almost certain to go ahead as both Europe and the United States have done nothing to stop similar encroachment into the West Bank.

 A prime example of  US impotence in stopping Israel settlement expansions  is the case of Har Homa when  “Condoleezza rice said in 2007 that Har Homa should not be built. Five years later it is a fact on the ground”[6].  Israel’s most recent slice into the west Bank will effectively kill peace as effectively there literally will be nothing to talk about as the plan favoured by just about everybody is under serious threat .

In sum, while it was a good move by the Palestinian authority to further their cause through the UN, Israel threatens to make their effort obsolete as they plan to effectively “concrete over the solution”[7].   


[1] H. Sherwood, 2012, Israel seizes $120m in Palestinian tax revenue over UN statehood vote, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/02/israel-palestinian-tax-revenue-un-vote?intcmp=239
[2] Ibid
[3] Ibid                                                                                                                                       
[4] Ibid
[5] Ibid
[6] The Guardian, 2012, Israel-Palestine: concreting over the solution, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/03/israel-palestine-concreting-solution-editorial?intcmp=239
[7] Ibid

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...