There are
many reasons as to why the United States are in Pakistan, but the most
prominent reason is because they have nuclear weapons in a country that has
always been on the edge of political, economic and social disaster.
US anxieties
about the security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal went into overdrive with the
ambitious attack by terrorists on a military air base “which is thought to
house part of the country's nuclear arsenal”[1]
. Former head of the CIA and current US defence secretary Leon Panetta went on
record revealing US fears of “Pakistan’s nuclear weapons falling to the wrong
hands” should terrorism not be tackled effectively[2].
The fears of
the United States have over Pakistan’s security are vindicated as militants
have carried out similar attacks on other military assets with militants
killing ten people attacking a naval base in Karachi[3].
However
Pakistani military officials were quick to rebuff suggestions of lax security.
A spokesman for the Pakistan foreign office insisted that Pakistan’s “strategic
assets are safe” and stressed that “all measures have been taken in this regard”[4].
However,
Pakistan and the United States attempts to tackle terrorists in the country
have been poor to say the least. This is exemplified by President Obama signing
a bill into law that gives secretary of state Hilary Clinton a month to decide
whether the Haqqani network ”meets the criteria of a terrorist group” despite
the US and others accusing the group of a number of terrorist attacks in Afghanistan
and Pakistan[5]. Pakistan’s
government and military has effectively surrendered north and South Waziristan in
the North West of the country having paid a costly price trying to stem the
flow of ‘Arab and central Asian fighters’[6].
The US drone
strike campaign in the region has brought about almost daily reports of the
death of ‘militants’ despite concerns over criteria used to classify who are or
are not ‘militants’ and the frequent use of drones in patches of the middle
east hostile to the policy ambitions of the west. It is also in part responsible
for why, according to a poll by the pew research center, 74% of Pakistanis see
the United Sates as an ‘enemy’[7].
In sum,
while Pakistan remains a cause for concern for obvious reasons, the US must
realise that there are other ways to help Pakistan than drone the north west of
country to little effect. However the political class of the US and Pakistan
must put aside their differences if they are. to quell terrorism in Pakistan
[1] J.
Boone, 2012, Suicide bombers storm Pakistan airbase, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/16/suicide-bombers-storm-pakistan-base
[2] Quoted
by The Times Of India, 2012, Pakistan’s nukes might fall into hands of
terrorists: Panetta, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-08-15/pakistan/33216067_1_nuclear-weapons-nuclear-power-terrorists
[3] A.
Siddique, 2012, How safe Is Pakistan’s Nuclear Arsenal?,
[4] A.
Hussain, 2012, Leon Panetta assertion rejected: Pakistan’s strategic assets
safe: FO, http://www.brecorder.com/general-news/172/1228620/
[5] The
Express Tribune, 2012, Clinton considers blacklist haqqani network, http://tribune.com.pk/story/422327/clinton-considers-blacklisting-haqqani-network/
[6]
BBC News, 2011, Haqqanis: Growth of a military network,
[7]
Pew Research center, 2012, Pakistani Public Opinion ever more critical of US, http://pewresearch.org/pubs/2297/pakistan-united-states-extremeist-groups-barack-obama-economic-aid-military-aid-taliban-haqqani-kashmir-khyber-pakhtunkhwa-asi-ali-zardari-yousaf-raza-gilani-imran-khan-tehreek-e-insaf-india
No comments:
Post a Comment